Height difference between sidewalk slabs is a tripping hazard
In a November 2013 trial decision, the court found in favour of the plaintiff with respect to a trip and fall on a city sidewalk.
In this case, Glenda Grayling and Kevin Grayling v. The Corporation of Haldimand County, the court found that a height difference in sidewalk slabs existed, that it was a tripping hazard, and the annual inspection missed the tripping hazard. The court found the plaintiff 50% responsible. The plaintiff was awarded $215,530 in damages, reduced to $107,765.
To read more about this case, please click here.
The content of this article or blog posting is of a general nature and does not constitute legal advice. It is not intended to be a full or complete analysis of the topic. Before applying the concepts or any content of this article or blog it is imperative that you consult your legal advisor.
Neither the author of this article or Singer Kwinter can accept any responsibility for financial loss nor gain of any nature should the reader not take advice from their legal advisor.